Home About Us Contact Us
`

 

Table of Content - Volume 18 Issue 3 - June 2021


 

Comprehensive Analysis of pattern of deaths due to train traffic accidents in Chennai

 

Manigandaraj G1*, Selvakumar R2

 

1Senior Assistant Professor, 2Professor and HOD, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Government Kilpauk Medical College and Hospital, Chennai – 10, INDIA.

Email: manigandaraj@yahoo.com

 

Abstract              Background: Railways being one of the commonest modes of transportation also have a risk of accidents associated to it2. Cities are locations having a high level of accumulation and concentration of economic activities and are complex spatial structures that are supported by transport systems. The evolution of mass rapid transport system in the form of sub-urban railway network has increased railway casualties in the cities as the railroads pass through residential and commercial zones.  Aim: The present study is to assess the analysis of death due to railway accidents. Material and Methods: In our study all railway accident deaths were studied for a period of (1) Year in the Year 2020 from 01-01-2020 to 31-12-2020. Out of 2719 Post – Mortem Examinations conducted in that year 58 deaths were found to deaths related to train traffic accidents which constitute (2.13%) of the total deaths. Results: The results shows Maximum cases of deaths due to train traffic accidents were seen in males (86.20%). Maximum deaths were seen in the age group of 31- 40 Years (37.93%). Maximum cases of deaths occurred in the morning hours between (6.00 A.M – 12.00 P.M) which is 67.24%. Maximum cases of deaths were due to Trespassing (46.55%). Maximum cases were brought dead to our hospital (96.55%). Maximum abrasions were seen over the head (41.37%). Maximum contusions were seen over the chest (37.93%). Maximum Lacerations were seen over the lower limb (25.86%). Maximum fractures were seen over the lower limbs (36.20%) The cause of death in maximum cases was head injury (18.96 %). Maximum cases were suicidal deaths (68.96%) followed by accidental (31.03%).

Key Words: Train Accidents, Autopsy, Gross Mutilation, Suicidal.

 

INTRODUCTION

Indian railways, which had a modest beginning in the year 1853, has since then been an integral part of the nation – a network that has held together a population of one billion. A self propelled social welfare system that has become the lifeline of a nation, Indian Railways has woven a sub-continent together and brought to life the concept of a united India. If it was trade of wool that prompted the journey of the first ever passenger train in England between Stockton and Darlington in 1825, it was trade of cotton, and among other things that prompted the journey of the first ever train on the Indian Sub –Continent. Railways were used by the British to consolidate their grip on the country. Slowly railway communication gained foothold in India, where the locomotive was once considered as a “fire – spitting demon”. It is one of the world’s largest railway networks comprising over 1, 15,000 KM of tract over 7,100 stations. Indian Railways carry approximately 8.425 billion passengers which are over 23 million passenger’s everyday Indian railways are the most complex well managed railway system in the world with the available resources1. Being the cheapest mode of transportation, most trains travel thickly packed, thus increasing the chances of accidents. Railway related deaths mostly occur when the tracks are used as a convenient route for walking. Other causes of death may be a collision between two trains, an automobile and train collision, a passenger falling out of the compartment door. Railways are also considered as a convenient method of suicide.2 In 1956, WHO advisory group defined accident as unpremeditated event resulting in recognisable damage occurrence in a sequence of events which usually produce unintended injury, death or property damage. Accidents are the ninth common cause of death in India. Though most of the fatalities in India are road traffic accidents, the railway accidents are not negligible particularly in urban and suburban railway zones.1 A train accident is defined as a collision, derailment, or any other event involving the operation of on-track equipment. Fortunately, train accidents (first category) do not happen very often, but when they do, they can be extremely catastrophic. Due to their weight, mass and force anything in a train path is in grave danger. A vast variety of injuries are caused due to railway accidents which are often difficult to assess during Post – Mortem Examination. Most of the cases of railway deaths hat were reported are either hit by the moving train or found in the surroundings of the railway track.1 The problem for investigating officer and Medico Legal Experts starts with identification as most of the reported cases are unknown and are in mutilated and badly mauled condition1. The challenge doubles up for the forensic expert if there are signs or suspicion of killing the person somewhere else and keeping the body on railway track so that the injuries may be concealed. But most of the railway fatalities are suicide or accidents. During autopsy, railway pattern of injuries should be differentiated from the other injuries and Ante-Mortem from Post – Mortem2. Thus special observations are required in case of presence of certain features such as wheel marks on the body, dirt and grease contamination and the manner of injuries to rule out criminal violence2.

 

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study has been used to derive epidemiological data in railway accidents, analytical study of the injuries that caused death and possible manner of death.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study is a prospective study in which deaths due to train traffic accident which has come with a requisition to the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology attached to Government Kilpauk Medical College and Hospital, Chennai -10, Tamil Nadu in the year 2020 from 01-01-2020 to 31-12-2020 were taken into consideration. A proforma was prepared such as sex, age, time of occurrence, cause of accident, duration of survival, pattern of injuries, cause of death and manner of death. It was then interpreted statiscally with tables and bar diagrams.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

All cases of deaths due to Train Traffic Accidents that have come with requisition for Post – Mortem Examination to Government Kilpauk Medical College and Hospital, Chennai -10 from 01-01-2020 to 31-12-2020.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Decomposed and skeletonised dead bodies were excluded out from our study.

 

OBSERVATIONS:

TABLE 1: SEX WISE DISTRIBUTION

SEX

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE %

MALE

50

86.20

FEMALE

08

13.79

TOTAL

58

100

Maximum cases of deaths due to train traffic accidents were seen in males (86.20%)

Figure 1:

 

TABLE 2: AGE WISE DISTRIBUTION

AGE (IN YEARS)

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE %

BIRTH TO 10

02

3.44

11-20

01

1.72

21-30

07

12.06

31-40

22

37.93

41-50

16

27.58

51-60

06

10.34

61-70

03

5.17

71-80

01

1.72

TOTAL

58

100

 

Maximum deaths were seen in the age group of 31- 40 Years (37.93%) followed by 41-50 Years (27.58%).

 

Figure 2

 

TABLE 3: TIME OF OCCURENCE

TIME

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE %

6.00 A.M TO 12 P.M

39

67.24

12.01 PM TO 6.00 P.M

06

10.34

6.01 P.M TO 11.59 P.M

13

22.41

TOTAL

58

100

Maximum cases of deaths occurred in the morning hours between (6.00 A.M – 12.00 P.M) which is 67.24% followed by evening hours between (6.01 P.M TO 11.59 P.M) which is 22.41%.

 

Figure 3

 

TABLE 4: CAUSE OF ACCIDENT

CAUSE OF ACCIDENT

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE %

JUMPING OR LYING INFRONT OF TRAIN

07

12.06

TRESPASSING

27

46.55

FALL FROM A MOVING TRAIN

05

8.62

FALL DURING BOARDING / ALIGHTING

03

5.17

ATTENDING NATURE CALLS

04

6.89

SPEAKING ON MOBILE

11

18.96

RAILWAY EMLOYEE ON WORK

01

1.72

TOTAL

58

100

Maximum cases of deaths were due to Trespassing (46.55%) followed by speaking on mobile (18.96%).

Figure 4

 

TABLE 5: DURATION OF SURVIVAL / BROUGHT DEAD

BROUGHT DEAD / SURVIVAL

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE %

BROUGHT DEAD

56

96.55

SURVIVAL UPTO 24 HOURS

02

3.44

TOTAL

58

100

Maximum cases were brought dead to our hospital (96.55%).

 

Figure 5


 

TABLE 6: PATTERN OF EXTERNAL INJURIES

INVOLVING PART

ABRASION

FREQUENCY

ABRASION

PERCENTAGE %

CONTUSION FREQUENCY

CONTUSION PERCENTAGE %

LACERATION FREQUENCY

LACERATION

PERCENTAGE %

FRACTURE

FREQUENCY

FRACTURE

PERCENTAGE %

FRACTURE PERCENTAGE %

HEAD

24

41.37

11

18.96

07

12.06

14

24.13

 

CHEST

14

24.13

22

37.93

13

22.41

07

12.06

 

ABDOMEN

11

18.96

12

20.68

12

20.68

05

8.62

 

UPPER LIMB

04

6.89

04

6.89

11

18.96

11

18.96

 

LOWER LIMB

05

8.62

09

15.51

15

25.86

21

36.20

 

TOTAL

58

100

58

100

58

100

58

100

 

Maximum abrasions were seen over the head (41.37%) followed by chest (24.13%). Maximum contusions were seen over the chest (37.93%) followed by abdomen (20.68%). Maximum Lacerations were seen over the lower limb (25.86%) followed by chest (22.41%). Maximum fractures were seen over the lower limbs (36.20%) followed by head (24.13%).

Figure 6

 

TABLE 7: CAUSE OF DEATH

PATTERN OF INJURY

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE %

BLUNT INJURY

09

15.51

HEAD INJURY

11

18.96

SPINAL INJURY

08

13.79

TRAUMATIC TRANSECTION

05

8.62

HEAD AND SPINE

04

6.89

CRUSH INJURY

05

8.62

DECAPITATION

05

8.62

MULTIPLE INJURIES

04

6.89

MULTIPLE INJURIES WITH ALL OTHER INJURIES.

07

12.06

TOTAL

58

100

The cause of death in maximum cases was head injury (18.96 %) followed by blunt injury (15.51%).

Figure 7

 

TABLE 8: MANNER OF DEATH

MANNER OF DEATH

FREQUENCY

PERCENTAGE %

SUICIDAL

40

68.96

ACCIDENTAL

18

31.03

HOMICIDAL

0

0

NATURAL

0

0

TOTAL

58

100

Maximum cases were suicidal deaths (68.96%) followed by accidental (31.03%).

 

Figure 8


DISCUSSION

Maximum cases of deaths due to train traffic accidents were seen in males (86.20%). This is similar to the study conducted by Mohanty MK, Panigrahi MK, Mohanty S, Patnaik KK4. This shows that male fatalities are much more common as they outweigh female fatalities. Maximum deaths were seen in the age group of 31- 40 Years (37.93%) followed by 41-50 Years (27.58%). This is almost similar to the study conducted by Biradar G, Shetty HP, Shetty B, Shetty CK6. This could be due to the fact that the young age groups are more vulnerable to suicides / accidents validating their stressful and ambiguous lifestyles. More or less it is the primary age group of the working class and daily labourers who go out into the city to earn their livelihood; they are the ones who met with a railway accident. Death of the person in that age is extremely difficult to cope up for the family as in most of the cases that person would be the primary bread winner in that family. Death of a person in that age group is a loss not only to the family but also to the country as the work force contributing to the growth of the economy is lost. Maximum cases of deaths occurred in the morning hours between (6.00 A.M – 12.00 P.M) which is 67.24% followed by evening hours between (6.01 P.M TO 11.59 P.M) which is 22.41%. This is almost similar to the study conducted by T.Mohit Kumar Moses, J Ammani1. This could be attributed to work time. People get into work in the morning and use public transport like rail network and come back in the evening after work which could have aggrevated the issue. Maximum cases of deaths were due to Trespassing (46.55%) followed by speaking on mobile (18.96%). This is similar to the study conducted by T.Mohit Kumar Moses, J Ammani1. This also can be attributed to work schedule of the working people. Maximum cases were brought dead to our hospital (96.55%). This is in contrast to the study conducted by Prachi Ahuja, Pavanchand Shetty H, Haniel L Dsouza, Jagadish Rao Padubidri, B Suresh Kumar Shetty, Shashidharan Kotian2 where people survived for considerable time in the hospital. This could be attributed to fatality involved in Chennai train traffic accidents as people are busy and doing multitasking by lethargically or preoccupied without any safety measures while trespassing / crossing the tracks. Maximum abrasions were seen over the head (41.37%) followed by chest (24.13%). Maximum contusions were seen over the chest (37.93%) followed by abdomen (20.68%). Maximum Lacerations were seen over the lower limb (25.86%) followed by chest (22.41%). Maximum fractures were seen over the lower limbs (36.20%) followed by head (24.13%). This is almost similar to the study conducted by Prachi Ahuja, Pavanchand Shetty H, Haniel L Dsouza, Jagadish Rao Padubidri, B Suresh Kumar Shetty, Shashidharan Kotian2. It can be attributed to the presenting part and its fatality at that material time. The cause of death in maximum cases was head injury (18.96 %) followed by blunt injury (15.51%). This is in contrast to the study conducted by T.Mohit Kumar Moses, J Ammani1 where multiple injuries was the commonest cause of death. This could be attributed to the position of the body at that material time and it varies from place to place based on the surface and presenting part involved.

Maximum cases were suicidal deaths (68.96%) followed by accidental (31.03%). This is in contrast to the study conducted by Aligbe JU, Akhiwu Nwosu SO13 where suicides were less. Our study is similar to the study conducted by Kumar Moses and J Ammani1. Manner of accident in railway fatalities during the study period has shown that the most number of accidents happened while crossing the railway track carelessly. Even though the people trespassing the track are prosecuted and fines being collected from them people seldom use the over bridge and under pass to cross the track, especially near the platforms where they have to change lines to catch another train. People are in such a hurry that they seriously misjudge the speed of the train and eventually take them out of the world instead of taking them to their destination.

 

CONCLUSION

Railway fatalities can pose great challenges to the Medico Legal Expert and investigation officer if they are investigated properly and autopsies conducted by observing everything carefully. The investigating officers should be very careful at the scene of crime in not losing any body parts at the scene of crime as this may lead to serious medico legal issues and many times it has panned like dog bringing any limb, human body parts in front of the hospital / road or any public area leading to a question of foul play/homicide. Therefore the investigating officer should be very careful and search in and around the track if any body parts are missing and then go ahead with their routine procedures.

RECOMMENDATIONS

To reduce Railway Accident Government has to create awareness program in relation to the safety guidelines, which in turn requires equal co operation from the general population. The Government has to invest in the up gradation of the infrastructure, which will improve the safety features.

 

REFERENCES

  1. T. Mohit Kumar Moses, J.Ammani “A Comprehensive study of deaths due to railway accidents reported at a tertiary care hospital mortuary during the period of January to December 2015. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research Volume 6 / Issue 8 / August 2019.
  2. Prachi Ahuja, Pavanchand Shetty H, Haniel L Dsouza, Jagadish Rao Padubidri, B Suresh Kumar Shetty, Shashidharan Kotian “Analysis of Railway Track Deaths” – An Autopsy based study. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, October – December 2019 Vol 13, Mo: 4.Page: 228 231.
  3. Valsala K, Sreedevi CS, Sreelakshmi J. Analysis of railway track deaths – an autopsy based study. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2017 Feb 20;5(3):935-9.
  4. Mohanty MK, Panigrahi MK, Mohanty S, Patnaik KK. Death due to traumatic railway injury. Medicine Science and the law. 2007 April; 47 (2):156-160.
  5. Malick S, Goswami A. Pattern of fatal railway injury in Sealldah (South) secton, kolkatta an autopsy based study. IOSR Journal of dental and medical sciences. 2017 october;16(12):17-21.
  6. Biradar G, Shetty HP, Shetty B, Shetty CK. Profile of railway accidents in Belary District – A 5 Year retrospective study. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2018;12(4):210-2.
  7. Valsala K, Sreedevi CS, Sreelakshmi J. An autopsy based comparative study of pattern of injuries in pedestrians involved in railway track deaths. International Journal of advanced research.2017 Jan; 5(1):1070-1077.
  8. Sheikh MT, Shah JV, Patel R. Study of deaths due to Railway Accident. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 2008; Volume 30, Issue 3, Print ISSN:0971-0973.
  9. Gharpure PV, Gharpure MA. The role of accidents in mortality. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences 1959; 3:227-231.
  10. Pathak A, Barai P, Mahajan AK, Rathod B, Desai KP, Basu S. Rising limbs and Life – Railway fatalities in vadodra (A retrospective Study). Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 2009;26:54-57.
  11. Modi’s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, edited by B.V.Subrahmanyam, 22nd edition, Butterworths India, New Delhi 1999 Page No:37.
  12. Bloch- Boguslawska E, Engeelgardt P, Wolska E, Paradowska. A Analyis of death caused by railway vehicles in the materials collected by the Department of Forensic Medicine in Bydgoszcz in the years 1992-2002. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol 2006:56:181-186.
  13.  Aligbe JU, Akhiwu Nwosu SO. Prospective study of coroner’s autopsies in bEnin City, Nigeria. Med Sci Law 2002; 42:318-324.
  14.  Davis CG, AlexandarCB, Brissie RM. A 15 – Year Review of Railway – Related Deaths in Jefferson County, Alabama. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 1997;18:363-368.
  15.  Etubu EN, Nwosu SO. Medicolegal autopsies in University of port Harcourt, Nigeria. Niger J Orthop Trauma 2003; 2:33-35.























 








 




 








 

 









Policy for Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology (Print ISSN:2579-0900) (Online ISSN: 2636-4654) agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.